CausalsPropose a change
Add or correct a node, relationship, source, time context, or review status.
Open graph proposal ↗Causals Commons
Good questions make
the graph better.
You can help without writing code. Show us a missing relationship, a weak source, a competing explanation, or an evaluation the system ought to pass.
Choose a contribution
Examine a proposal
Check what the cited material actually supports and note counterevidence or an alternative interpretation.
Browse open issues ↗Suggest a test
Define a question, evidence requirements, answer criteria, and likely failure modes for graph-and-model reasoning.
Open a new issue ↗A useful graph proposal
Give others enough to verify.
- Identify the record. Include its stable ID or link if one exists, and describe the exact change.
- Show the evidence. Link to accessible sources and explain what each actually supports.
- State the limits. Note scope, time period, uncertainty, and known counterevidence.
- Expect review. A proposal may be accepted, disputed, revised, or declined with a reason.
Contribution principle
Source material, a graph record, and an interpretation of causality are separate things. Please make the distinction explicit in your proposal.
Source material, a graph record, and an interpretation of causality are separate things. Please make the distinction explicit in your proposal.
Link to sources instead of copying substantial copyrighted material. Do not post non-public personal information. For full guidance, read the contribution guide ↗.